Would it be easy to mod the code to keep the properties of the new layer as "bylayer"? Look at this (list (cons 8 lay)'(62 . 256) '(6 . "ByLayer") '(370 . -1)))) and compare Lee's and Tharwats also check out what the assoc numbers 62, 6 & 370 actually mean. The original code by Tharwat only had the single (cons 8 lay) option so it would adopt the new layers properties.
Thanks BIGAL. I now know what Im doing with my lunch break. If you get stuck I'll happily help out - good luck!
页:
1
[2]