Help me out guys, fishy post o

f700es · 发表于 2022-7-8 16:07:30

https://sketchuphub.com/sketchup-and-autocad-floor-plans/

Here we have supposed comparison of 2 PDFs, one from AutoCAD and the other from SketchUp (using Layout I imagine). I took a look as I use both and I think I might have found some BS. They have posted 2 jpgs of the plans as well as PDFs. I decided to look closer at the PDFs and see with out matched what I see from my own PDF files from AutoCAD. Low and behold when I open the supposed PDF from AutoCAD it is a raster PDF with very low pixel quality. That is SO weird as AutoCAD PDFs are vector output and suffer NO pixelation what so ever. I honestly think I have uncovered some flat out fabrication by the blog author.

Cad64 · 发表于 2022-7-8 16:38:52

Seriously? Again you can't do a proper comparison. Zoom in to the same degree that I did. Upper right corner.

Neets1604 · 发表于 2022-7-8 17:05:44

Through a browser, sure. CAD64 and I both used Acrobat (the worlds most used PDF program) and zoomed in as we (from YEARS of CAD use) know an AutoCAD PDF when we see one. I also opened the PDF in Adobe Illustrator as I know how AutoCAD prints it's curves to a PDF and I know how awful SU is with curves (it can't do them). This showed me that the PDF did not come from AutoCAD, as your blog claimed it did. A CAD viewer is NOT AutoCAD. This is not semantics or some subjective opinion, it is a yes or no that can be measured. Plain and simple. Again you have some great info and talent but there is no need in a comparison that is not needed. I know it's trendy to poop on AutoCAD over at Sketchucation, I see it all the time.

Cad64 · 发表于 2022-7-8 17:26:06

What about them? TIL (today I learned) that site hits equate to being right or wrong.

[综合讨论] Help me out guys, fishy post o

发表回复

精选推荐