乐筑天下

搜索
欢迎各位开发者和用户入驻本平台 尊重版权,从我做起,拒绝盗版,拒绝倒卖 签到、发布资源、邀请好友注册,可以获得银币 请注意保管好自己的密码,避免账户资金被盗
查看: 109|回复: 6

[综合讨论] Solidworks Vs. CATIA

[复制链接]

1

主题

1

帖子

0

银币

初来乍到

Rank: 1

铜币
5
发表于 2022-7-9 06:31:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Anybody is familar with Solidworks + CATIA?
i will like to know the difference & strong features of both.
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

4

帖子

4

银币

初来乍到

Rank: 1

铜币
0
发表于 2022-7-9 06:47:05 | 显示全部楼层
 
 
In concept they are both the same. Mechanical design software. Part, Assembly and Drafting (2D). SolidWorks is designed for the small to medium size company and is generally meant for the product and machine design industry.
 
CATIA is mainly made for the Automotive and Aerospace. It has many specialized modes (called workbenches) that focus on a specific application (Composites, NC, Ergonomics, etc...)
 
They are both own by Dassault systemes. SolidWorks starts at a 3rd of the price of CATIA and is good value for money. But, when you get into the high-end class A surfacing and the like, CATIA is the better choice.
回复

使用道具 举报

18

主题

434

帖子

422

银币

初露锋芒

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

铜币
94
发表于 2022-7-9 06:54:10 | 显示全部楼层
I found SW more userfriendly, but Catia is more powerful.
回复

使用道具 举报

21

主题

1086

帖子

1065

银币

初露锋芒

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

铜币
105
发表于 2022-7-9 07:05:00 | 显示全部楼层
I put Catia and Unigraphics in the same cup.  Very very powerful software packages.  Not the most user friendly but certainly designed for auto/ship/aero industries.  I have found SW to be very powerful and very user friendly.  SW does have composite capabilities in 09 now.
 
What do you need to do?
回复

使用道具 举报

2

主题

12

帖子

10

银币

初来乍到

Rank: 1

铜币
10
发表于 2022-7-9 07:19:49 | 显示全部楼层
in the world, there are only two (product lifecycle management) PLM complete solutions, Catia & Siemens NX. They do everything in product lifecycle by their own, starting CAD, CAE, CAM, PDM, to the collaboration platform.
 
Other companies are just selling a product/products of PLM. Or they need add-ons to "form" a complete solution. Broken links/failed updates/Duplicated files are often found. This is a critical defeat that most big companies cannot tolerate when building a big design. The cost of reworks and the penalty fee due to project delay are higher than the investment on softwares.
 
But if we just focus on CAD with some surfacing commands, Solidworks is a good choice since its price is much lower than catia's.
 
be careful that SW & Catia files are not exchangable. if one day we want to upgrade from SW to cata, all old SW files will become DUMP solids/surfaces & feature trees will be lost under catia environment.
回复

使用道具 举报

2

主题

12

帖子

10

银币

初来乍到

Rank: 1

铜币
10
发表于 2022-7-9 07:28:47 | 显示全部楼层
Today's Catia has been very different. Today's CAD has been very different. We are talking about the whole design process, instead of commands.
 
Looking at this demo, we can see the direction.
回复

使用道具 举报

21

主题

1086

帖子

1065

银币

初露锋芒

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

铜币
105
发表于 2022-7-9 07:35:46 | 显示全部楼层
Keep in mind that Dassault owns Catia and Solidworks.  They aquired solidworks some time ago but they still are different platforms.  I think we are slowly seeing SW adopt the V6 platform, at least in some of the peripherals.
回复

使用道具 举报

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 微信公众平台

  • 扫描访问手机版

  • 点击图片下载手机App

QQ|关于我们|小黑屋|乐筑天下 繁体中文

GMT+8, 2024-11-22 07:21 , Processed in 0.179097 second(s), 66 queries .

© 2020-2024 乐筑天下

联系客服 关注微信 帮助中心 下载APP 返回顶部 返回列表