CopyStored.lsp - Copy stored o

alanjt · 发表于 2022-7-5 14:17:01

Generally, it will stay under 250k, but I couldn't get it below 400 on this one.

Pither Rukka · 发表于 2022-7-5 14:22:12

Good lisp, I have a dream become a Autlisp programmer to help my job and my designer colleague

alanjt · 发表于 2022-7-5 14:24:47

Cheers.
Helps me from time to time.

SteveBubendorf · 发表于 2022-7-5 14:27:14

Alanjt

Your "CopyStored.lsp" program (As posted on the CadTutor website) appears to be one which would be very valuable to me. The entire code listing is not available for copy and paste from the code listing on the forum. Is this something that you would be willing to repost so that it could be copied in its entirety?

Thank you for all of the code that you have posted on the website, and for all of the assistance that I see you have provided to "newbees" like myself.

BlackBox · 发表于 2022-7-5 14:31:07

Great concept, Alan!

Would you be willing to re-post the routine, and if not, provide it to me offline (at your discretion)?

SteveBubendorf · 发表于 2022-7-5 14:34:10

Alan,

The concept of your CopyStored.lsp program sounded like something that I would use a lot. Although I was unable to download it, it inspired me to take a stab at something myself. What I came up with was surprisingly simple (more of a macro than a real progam), but will still fit my needs quite nicely, I think. It doesn't provide nearly as many options as yours would have, I'm sure, and I'm sure it is not nearly as elegant, either, but I thought I'd add it to your post, here, in case it might benefit someone else, who, like me, was unable to download your program. I actually split mine up into 4 separate little programs. Two are designed to save separate copysets for future use, while the other two actually perform the copy operations. I have two of each, so that I can have two separate copysets available. I thought about combining everything into one program and making the number of copy sets a user specified option, but I'll leave that for another time, since the extra features are hardly worth the extra "programming" time at this moment.

Thank you for the idea !!!